Tomography in soil science
https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2016-86-28-34
Abstract
The main advantages of applying computed tomography to studying soil samples include non-invasiveness, independence of the moisture content in the samples and the possibility for mathematical modelling. The methodological problems of this imaging technique include restrictions of the sample size, resolution limitations and segmentation difficulties.
About the Authors
E. B. Skvortsova
Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. V. Shein
Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute; Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
K. N. Abrosimov
Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
K. M. Gerke
Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute; Institute of Geosphere Dynamics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. V. Korost
Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
K. A. Romanenko
Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. S. Belokhin
Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Dembovetskii
Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. S. H. Anderson, C. J. Gantzer, J. M. Boone and R. J. Tully, “Rapid nondestructive bulk density and soil-water content determination by computed tomography,” Soil Science of America, 52, 35-40 (1988).
2. K. M. Gerke, E. B. Skvortsova and D. V. Korost, “Tomographic method of studying soil pore space: Current perspectives and results for some Russian soils,” Eurasian Soil Science, 45 (7), 700-709 (2012). doi: 10.1134/S1064229312070034
3. S. Crestana, R. Cesareo and S. Mascarenhas, “Using a computed-tomography miniscanner in soil science,” Soil Science, 142, 56-61 (1986).
4. J. R. Helliwella, C. J. Sturrocka, K. M. Graylinga, S. R. Tracya, R. J. Flavelb, I. M. Youngb, W. R. Whalleyc and S. J. Mooneya, “Applications of X-ray computed tomography for examining biophysical interactions and structural development in soil systems: a review,” European Journal of Soil Science, 64, 279-297 (2013).
5. M. B. Karasanina, K. M. Gerke, R. V. Vasiliev and D. V. Korost, “Modelling of the structure of materials with desirable properties using correlation equations,” Mathematical modelling, 27(4), 50-63 (2015) [in Russian].
6. C. M. C. Laplante, “The application of destructive and non-destructive testing techniques to qualitatively analyze the cracking structure produced by freeze-thaw cycles in compacted fine-grained soils.” Ph. D Thesis (1998).
7. R. Muthukrishnan and M. Radha, “Edge detection techniques for Image segmentation.” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 3 (6), 259-267 (2011).
8. S. Peth, “Applications of microtomography in soils and sediments,” Developments in Soil Science, 34, 73-101 (2010).
9. S. Peth, J. Nellesen, G. Fischer and R. Horn, “Non-invasive 3D analysis of local soil deformation under mechanical and hydraulic stresses by mu CT and digital image correlation,” Soil and Tillage Research, 111, 3-18 (2010).
10. L. F. Pires, O.O.S. Bacchi and K. Reichardt, “Assessment of soil structure repair due to wetting and drying cycles through 2D tomographic image analysis,” Soil and Tillage Research, 94, 537-545 (2007).
11. K. A. Romanenko, V. V. Rogov, A. V. Yudina, K. N. Abrosimov, E. B. Skvortsova and A. N. Kurchatova, “Studying the microstructure of frozen soils and sediments with the use of X-ray computed tomography: techniques, approaches and prospectes,” Byulleten Pochvennogo instituta im. V.V. Dokuchaeva (2017), in print [in Russian].
12. E. V. Shein, E. B. Skvortsova, A. V. Dembovetskii, K. N. Abrosimov, L. I. Il’in and N. A. Shnyrev, “Pore-size distribution in loamy soils: A comparison between microtomographic and capillarimetric determination methods,” Eurasian Soil Science, 49 (3), 315-325 (2016). doi: 10.1134/S1064229316030091
13. E. B. Skvortsova, E. V. Shein, A. V. Dembovetskii, K. N. Abrosimov, N. A. Shnyrev, K. M. Gerke, K. A. Romanenko and A. B. Skvortsov, “A study of loamy soil's microstructural changes during swelling and shrinkage using x-ray microtomography,” Proc. Int. Conf. “Applied Ecology: Problems, Innovations” (Batumi, Tbilisi, Georgia, 2015).
14. I. A. Taina, R. J. Heck, W. Deen and E. Y. T. Ma, “Quantification of freeze-thaw related structure in cultivated topsoils using X-ray computer tomography,” Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 93, 533-553 (2013).
15. I. A. Taina, R. J. Heck and T. R. Elliot, “Application of X-ray computed tomography to soil science: a literature review,” Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 88, 1-20 (2008).
16. J. K. Torrance, T. Elliot, R. Martin and R. J. Heck, “X-ray computed tomography of frozen soil,” Cold regions science and technology, 53, 75-82 (2008).
Review
For citations:
Skvortsova E.B., Shein E.V., Abrosimov K.N., Gerke K.M., Korost D.V., Romanenko K.A., Belokhin V.S., Dembovetskii A.V. Tomography in soil science. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin. 2016;(86):28-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2016-86-28-34
Views:
1017
Email this article 
