Preview

Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin

Advanced search

SEPARATION OF PERIPHERY AND INNER PARTS OF SOIL AGGREGATES BY MECHANICAL ABRASION

https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2018-93-94-104

Abstract

To separate the aggregates into the inner part (core) and the periphery (bark), the aggregates were rubbed against one another. For this purpose, aggregates of 5–3 mm were shaken 48 hours on a over head shaker, they rubbed against each other, and gradually their bark was grinded, passing into the fraction <0.25 mm. To monitor the process, the abrasion efficiency from the change in the size distribution of the size fractions was periodically evaluated. At the end of the ex-periment, the carbon and nitrogen contents were determined in the fractions obtained. The distribution of the resulting size fractions was stabilized after 16 hours of the experiment, in the case of Chernozem under the steppe, and after 24 hours in the case of Retisol under forest. In the Retisol abrasion (from the large aggregates, the peripheral part separates and particles <0.25 mm are formed) were observed throughout the entire experiment. In Chernozem, after the first hour of treatment, fragmentation of the aggregates predominated, then in the next 10 hours abrasion prevailed, then again crushing dominated. Determination of the carbon and nitrogen content shows the anisotropy of aggregates in this parameter. Inside the aggregates, the carbon content is higher than at the periphery, with the C/N ratio indicating the predominance of poorly-decom-posed plant residues. Moreover, these differences are more expressed in uncultivated soils, and when comparing types, in Retisols in comparison with Chernozems. In general, the proposed approach is promising. However, it requires further development for an effective application.

About the Authors

V. A. Kholodov
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Russian Federation
Russia, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevskii per. 7-2


S. A. Garbuz
Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University
New Zealand
Palmerston North, New Zealand


N. V. Yaroslavtseva
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Russian Federation
Russia, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevskii per. 7-2


E. Yu. Milanovskiy
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russia, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevskii per. 7-2


M. A. Yashin
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Russian Federation
119017, Moscow, Pyzhevskii per. 7-2


References

1. Garbuz S.A., Yaroslavtseva N.V., Kholodov V.A. Enzymatic activity inside and outside of water-stable aggregates in soil under different land use, Eurasian Soil Science, 2016, V. 49 (3), pp. 367–375. doi: 10.1134/S1064229316030030

2. Dymov A.A., Milanovskiy E.Yu, Kholodov V.A. Composition and Hydrophobic Properties of Organic Matter in the Densimetric Fractions of Soils from the Subpolar Urals, Eurasian Soil Science, 2015, V. 48 (11), pp. 1212–1221 doi: 10.1134/S1064229315110058

3. Classification and Diagnostics of Soils of the Soviet Union, Moscow, Kolos Publ, 1977. 223 p. (in Russian).

4. Shein E.V. Lectures on Soil Physics. Moscow,. Moscow State University Publ., 2005, 432 p. (in Russian).

5. Kholodov V. A., Yaroslavtseva N. V., Lazarev V. I., Frid A. S. Interpretation of data on the aggregate composition of typical chernozems under different land use by cluster and principal component analyses, Eurasian Soil Science, 2016, V. 49 (9), pp. 1026–1032. doi: 10.1134/S1064229316090076

6. Chenu C., Hassink J., Bloem J. Short-term changes in the spatial distribution of microorganisms in soil aggregates as affected by glucose addition, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 2001, V. 34, pp. 349–356. doi:10.1007,s003740100419

7. Golchin A., Oades J.M., Skjemstad J.O., Clarke P. Structural and dynamic properties of soil organic matter as reflected by 13C natural abudance, pyrolysis mass spectrometry and solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy in density fractions of an Oxisol under forest and pasture, Australian J. Soil Res., 1995, V. 33, pp. 59–76.

8. Mummey D.L., Stahl P.D. Analysis of Soil Whole- and Inner-Microaggregate Bacterial Communities, Microb. Ecol., 2004, V. 48, pp. 41–50. doi:10.1007,s00248-003-1000-4

9. Ranjard L., Poly F., Combrisson J., Richaume A., Gourbiere F., Thioulouse J., Nazaret S. Heterogeneous cell density and genetic structure of bacterial pools associated with various soil microenvironments as determined by enumeration and DNA fingerprinting approach (RISA), Microb. Ecol. 2000, V. 39, pp. 263–272. doi:10.1007,s002480000032

10. Ranjard L., Richaume A., Jocteur-Monrozier L., Nazaret S. Response of soil bacteria to Hg(II) in relation to soil characteristics and cell location, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 1997, V. 24, pp. 321–331. doi:10.1111,j.1574-6941.1997.tb00449.x

11. Reichel R., Patzelt D., Barleben C., Rosendahl I., Ellerbrock R.H., Thiele-Bruhn S. Soil microbial community responses to sulfadiazine-contaminated manure in different soil microhabitats, Appl. Soil Ecology, 2014, V. 80, pp. 15–25.

12. Six J., Bossuyt H., Degryze S., Denef K. A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics, Soil Tillage Res., 2004, V. 79, pp. 7–31.

13. World reference base for soil resources 2014. A framework for international classification, correlation and communication, Word Soil Resourse Report 106, FAO, Rome, 2014, 181 p.


Review

For citations:


Kholodov V.A., Garbuz S.A., Yaroslavtseva N.V., Milanovskiy E.Yu., Yashin M.A. SEPARATION OF PERIPHERY AND INNER PARTS OF SOIL AGGREGATES BY MECHANICAL ABRASION. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin. 2018;(93):94-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2018-93-94-104

Views: 850


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0136-1694 (Print)
ISSN 2312-4202 (Online)