THE ASSESSMENT OF ANALYTICAL DOUBLE-SHOT PYROLYSIS WITH GAS CHROMATOGRAPH-MASS SPECTROMETRY APPLICATION OPPORTUNITY FOR THE HUMIC MATTER INVESTIGATION IN SITU
https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2018-94-3-18
Abstract
Double-shot pyrolysis with gas chromatography and mass detection (Double-shot GC MS) was conducted for a sample of typical chernozem and humic acids separated from it. The humic acids preparations were pyrolyzed at 500, 600 and 700°C. The data were compared with the lignin pyrograms witch were obtained under similar conditions. It was shown that 500°C is the optimum temperature for pyrolysis of humic acids obtained from Chernozems. Toluene in pyrolysis products may be considered as a marker of excessively high temperature occurring during the experiment. The results of a Doubleshot pyrolysis for the soil itself and the humic acids which were extracted from it were compared. Eight products of the soil pyrolysis coincided with substances determined in humic acids (with a total of 41). In the case of thermal desorption of the soil, there were only three such substances, and they also were detected during subsequent pyrolysis of the soil sample. The data obtained speak about the predominantly macromolecular composition of humic substances. The conducted works demonstrate the posibility and perspective for using the Doubleshot pyrolysis GC MS for in situ investigation of soil organic matter, humus matter in general and humic acids in particular.
About the Authors
V. A. Kholodov
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Russia, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevskii per., 7-2
Yu. R. Farkhodov
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Russia, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevskii per., 7-2
Russian Federation
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Russia, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevskii per., 7-2
A. Zherebker
3Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
Institute for Energy Problems of Chemical Physics of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russia, 143025, Moscow area, Skolkovo, ul. Novaya 100
N. V. Yaroslavtseva
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Russian Federation
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Russia, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevskii per., 7-2
Russian Federation
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Russia, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevskii per., 7-2
References
1. Ivanov A.L., Kogut B.M., Semenov V.M., Turina Oberlander M.I., Waksman Schanbacher N. The Development of Theory on Humus and Soil Organic Matter: from Turin and Waksman to Present Days, Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin, 2017, V. 90, pp. 3-38. doi 10.19047/0136-1694-2017-3-38
2. Classification and Diagnostics of Soils of the Soviet Union. Moscow, Kolos, 1977, 223 p. (in Russian).
3. Kovaleva N.O., Kovalev I.V. Lignin phenols in soils as biomarkers of paleovegetation, Eurasian Soil Science, 2015, V. 48 ( 9), pp.1073–1086. doi: 10.1134/S1064229315090057
4. Kononova M.M. Soil Organic Matter. Its Nature, Its Role in Soil Formation and in Soil Fertility, Oxford: Pergamon, 1966, 544 p.
5. Kulikova N.A., Filippova O.I., Perminova I.V Protective activity of humic substances in relation to wheat seedlings under water deficiency conditions, Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin, 2018, V. 2, pp. 76-80. https://istina.msu.ru/publications/article/115167519/
6. Lehmann J., Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter, Nature, 2015, V. 528, pp. 60–68. doi: 10.1038/nature16069
7. Kholodov V.A., Konstantinov A.I., Kudryavtsev A.V., Perminova I.V. Structure of humic acids in zonal soils from 13С NMR data, Eurasian Soil Science, 2011, V. 44, № 9, pp. 976-983. doi: 10.1134/S1064229311090043
8. Kholodov V.A., Yaroslavtseva N.V., Konstantinov A.I., Perminova I.V. Preparative yield and properties of humic acids obtained by sequential alkaline extractions, Eurasian Soil Science, 2015, V. 48 (10), pp. 1101-1109. doi: 10.1134/S1064229315100051
9. Applied Pyrolysis Handbook / Eds. Wampler T.P. London, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2006, 304 p.
10. Orlov D.S. Humic acid and general theory of humification. Moscow. Moscow State University, 1990, 325 p. (in Russian).
11. Perminova I, V.Size exclusion chromatography of humic substances: Complexities of data interpretation attributable to non-size exclusion effects, Soil Sci. 1999, V. 164, pp. 834-840.
12. Piccolo A., Nardi S., Concher G. Macromolecular changes of humic substances induced by interaction with organic acids, European J. Soil Sci. 1996, V. 47, pp. 319-328.
13. Quénéa K., Derenne S., González-Vila F.J., González-Pérez J.A., Mariotti A., Largeau C. Double-shot pyrolysis of the non-hydrolysable organic fraction isolated from a sandy forest soil (Landes de Gascogne, South-West France):
14. Comparison with classical Curie point pyrolysis, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2006, V. 76 (1–2), pp. 271–279.
15. Lu X.Q., Hanna J.V., Johnson W.D. Source indicators of humic substances: An elemental composition, solid state 13C CP/MAS NMR and Py-GC/MS study, Appl. Geochemistry, 2000, V. 15, pp. 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00103-1
16. Saiz-Jimenez C. Analytical Pyrolysis of Humic Substances: Pitfalls, Limitations, and Possible Solutions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1994, V. 28 (11), pp. 1773–1780.
17. Swift R.S. Organic matter characterization (chap 35), Methods of soil analysis. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, 1996. Part 3, pp. 1018-1020.
18. World reference base for soil resources 2014. A framework for international classification, correlation and communication, Word Soil Resourse Report 106. FAO. Rome, 2014, 181 p.
Review
For citations:
Kholodov V.A., Farkhodov Yu.R., Zherebker A., Yaroslavtseva N.V. THE ASSESSMENT OF ANALYTICAL DOUBLE-SHOT PYROLYSIS WITH GAS CHROMATOGRAPH-MASS SPECTROMETRY APPLICATION OPPORTUNITY FOR THE HUMIC MATTER INVESTIGATION IN SITU. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin. 2018;(94):3-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2018-94-3-18
Views:
1256
Email this article 
