Preview

Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin

Advanced search

Determination of soil and ground sealing in functional zones of Volgograd based on remote sensing data

https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2021-107-116-138

Abstract

The paper presents the results of interpretation of sealed soils and ground for the territory of Volgograd and its various functional zones. Determination of the sealed portion was performed by means of automated method using ENVI 4.7 software by means of QuickBird space image classification using the “maximum likelihood” method. The study objects were the territories of all districts of Volgograd, as well as residential and recreational functional zones. It was found that the sealed surfaces occupy about 169.4 km2 (20.5% of the total area of the city). However, the city districts and functional zones differ significantly in proportion of sealed areas. The most sealed surfaces were those of Tractorozavodsky (24.2%), Voroshilovsky (33.0%), Dzerzhinsky (37.4%), Centralny (45.2%), Krasnooktyabrsky (39.4%) and Krasnoarmeisky (26.6%) districts of Volgograd. Soil cover of the Sovetsky (13.5%) and Kirovsky (12.9%) districts is least sealed. Sealing of functional zones also varies widely. Thus, the highest values of sealing (up to 63%) characterize the multi-, low- and medium-rise constructions zones. A wide range of values (from 26 to 51%) corresponds to the areas of individual residential development, as well as collective gardens and dachas (from 9.6 to 39.5%). In the recreational zone average sealing is at 27.6% level. Thus, the identified share of sealed surfaces on the territory of Volgograd and its functional zones will allow solving effectively the problems of territorial planning in the further implementation of works on gardening and landscaping of urban areas.

About the Author

O. A. Gordienko
Volgograd State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Vlasov D.V., Kasimov N.S., Kosheleva N.E., Kartografirovanie landshaftno-geohimicheskoj struktury urbanizirovannoj territorii (na primere Moskvy) (Mapping of landscape and geochemical structure of urban territory (Moscow case study)), InterCarto/InterGIS, 2017, No. 23, pp. 242–255.

2. Gorbov S.N., Gorovcov A.V., Bezuglova O.S., Varduni T.V., Tagiverdiev S.S., Biologicheskaya aktivnost' zapechatannyh pochv Rostova-na-Donu (The biological activity of sealed soils in Rostov-on-Don city), Izvestia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, 2016, No. 2, pp. 331–336.

3. Gordienko O.A., Manaenkov I.V., Kholodenko A.V., Ivancova E.A., Kartografirovanie i ocenka stepeni zapechatannosti pochv goroda Volgograda (Mapping and Assessment of Sealing Rate of Soils in the City of Volgograd), Pochvovedenie, 2019, No. 11, pp. 1383–1392.

4. Kosheleva O.Yu., Ocenka zapechatannosti pochvennogo pokrova goroda Volgograda (Evaluation of the sealed soil cover in the Volgograd city), Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seria: Geografia. Geoekologia, 2019, No. 1, pp. 12–18.

5. Kosheleva O.Y., Shinkarenko S.S., Gordienko O.A., Dubacheva A.A., Omarov R.S., Sutochnaya i sezonnaya dinamika temperatury poverhnosti goroda Volgograda (Daily and Seasonal Dynamics of Surface Temperature in the Volgograd City), Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seria: Geografia. Geoekologia, 2021, No. 1, pp. 14–24.

6. Kulik K.N., Agrolesomeliorativnoe kartografirovanie i fitoekologicheskaya otsenka aridnykh landshaftov (Agroforestry mapping and phytoecological assessment of arid landscapes), Volgograd: VNIALMI, 2004, 247 p.

7. Mohamed E.S., Belal A., Shalaby A., Ocenka poter' plodorodnyh pochv v rezul'tate zapechatyvaniya po dan-nym distancionnogo zondirovaniya i geoinformacionnyh sistem (Impacts of soil sealing on potential agriculture in Egypt using remote sensing and GIS techniques), Pochvovedenie, 2015, No. 10, pp. 1159–1169.

8. Nikiforova E.M., Kosheleva N.E., Hajbrahmanov T.S., Ekologo-geohimicheskaya ocenka sostoyaniya zapechatannyh pochv vostochnoj Moskvy (Environmental and geochemical assessment of sealed soils in the eastern Moscow), Vestnik RUDN. Ser. Ekologiya i bezopasnost' zhiznedeyatel'nosti, 2017, pp. 480–509.

9. Dobrovol’skii G.V., Soil, City, and Ecology, Moscow, 1997, 320 p.

10. Prokof'eva T.V., Gorodskie pochvy, zapechatannye dorozhnymi pokry-tiyami (na primere Moskvy): Avtoref. dis. … kand. biol. nauk (Urban soils sealed by road surfaces (the example of Moscow), Extended abstract of cand. biol. sci. thesis), Moscow, 1988, 24 p.

11. Savin I.Yu., Kartografirovanie ekranozemov Moskovskoj aglomeracii po sputnikovym dannym Landsat (Mapping of sealed soils of Moscow agglomeration according to Landsat satellite data), Issledovanie zemli iz kosmosa, 2013, No. 5, pp. 55–61.

12. Khaibrakhmanov T.S., Nikiforova E.M., Kosheleva N.E., Kartografiche-skoe obespechenie ekologo-geohimicheskoj ocenki zapechatannyh pochv na urbanizirovannyh territoriyah (Cartographic support of environmental and geochemical evaluation of sealed soils on urbanized territories), InterCarto/InterGIS, 2017, No. 23, pp. 256–266.

13. Shinkarenko S.S., Kosheleva O.Yu., Gordienko O.A., Dubacheva A.A., Omarov R.S., Analiz vliyaniya zapechatannosti pochvennogo pokrova i oze-leneniya na pole temperatur Volgogradskoj aglomeracii po dannym MODIS (Analysis of the effect of soil sealing and landscaping on the thermal field of the Volgograd agglomeration from MODIS data), Sovremennye problemy distancionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2020, No. 5, pp. 125–141.

14. Barbero‐Sierra C., Marques M.J., Ruiz‐Pérez M., The case of urban sprawl in Spain as an active and irreversible driving force for desertification, Journal of Arid Environments, 2013, No. 90, pp. 95–102.

15. Charzyński P., Plak A., Hanaka A., Influence of the soil sealing on the geoaccumulation index of heavy metals and various pollution factors, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, No. 24, pp. 4801–4811.

16. Cortijo A.A, González M.E.P., Soil sealing in Madrid (Spain), study case of Colmenar Viejo, Earth Sci. Res, 2017, No. 3, pp. 111–116.

17. Foody G.M., Classification accuracy assessment: some alternatives to the kappa coefficient for nominal and ordinal level classifications, Remote sensing from research to operation: Proc. of the 18th Annual Conference of the Remote Sensing Society, 1992, Nottingham.

18. García P., Pérez E., Mapping of soil sealing by vegetation indexes and built-up index: A case study in Madrid (Spain), Geoderma, 2016, Vol. 268, pp. 100–107.

19. García P., Pérez E., Monitoring Soil Sealing in Guadarrama River Basin, Spain, and Its Potential Impact in Agricultural Areas, Agriculture, 2016, No. 6, pp. 1–11.

20. Google maps. URL: https://www.google.ru/maps.

21. IUSS Working Group World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports, No. 106, FAO, Rome, 192 p.

22. Kopecká M., Rosina K., Soil Sealing Assessment in the Town Trnava, Geographical Information, 2012, No. 16, pp. 192–203.

23. Nakayama T., Watanabe M., Kazunori T., Morioka T., Effect of underground urban structures on eutrophic coastal environments, Science of Total Environment, 2007, No. 373, pp. 270–288.

24. Piotrowska-Długosz A., Charzyński P., The impact of soil sealing degree on microbial biomass, enzymatic activity, and physiochemical properties in the Ekranic Technosols of Toru. (Poland), Soils and Sediments, 2014, No. 15, pp. 47–59.

25. Salvati L., The Spatial Pattern of Soil Sealing along the Urban-Rural Gradient in a Mediterranean Region, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2014, No. 57, pp. 848–861.

26. Salvati L., Carlucci M., The way towards land consumption: soil sealing and polycentric development in Barcelona, Urban Studies, 2016, No. 53 (2), pp. 418–440.

27. Scalenghe R., Ajmone Marsan F., The anthropogenic sealing of soils in urban areas, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009, No. 90, pp. 1–10.

28. Tikhonova A., Polovinkina Yu., Gordienko O., Manaenkov I., Features of Monitoring Heavy Metals in Soil Cover of Urban Environment, Proc. of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference “Anthropogenic Transformation of Geospace: Nature, Economy, Society”, 2020, pp. 286–291.

29. Tobias S., Preserving ecosystem services in urban regions: Challenges for planning and best practice examples from Switzerland, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2013, No. 9 (2), pp. 243–251.

30. Tombolini I., Munafò M., Salvati L., Soil sealing footprint as an indicator of dispersed urban growth: a multivariate statistics approach, Urban Research & Practice, 2015, Iss. 1, pp. 1–15.

31. Toth G., Impact of land‐take on the land resource base for crop production in the European Union, Science of the Total Environment, 2012, No. 435, 202–214.

32. Xiao R., Su S., Zhang Z., Qi J., Jiang D., Wu J., Dynamics of Soil Sealing and Soil Landscape Patterns under Rapid Urbanization, Catena, 2013, No. 109, pp. 1–12.

33.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Gordienko O.A. Determination of soil and ground sealing in functional zones of Volgograd based on remote sensing data. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin. 2021;(107):116-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2021-107-116-138

Views: 590


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0136-1694 (Print)
ISSN 2312-4202 (Online)