Methods for determining the organic carbon content in soils (critical review)
https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2023-114-5-28
Abstract
The paper presents theoretical basis of the methods for determining the content of soil organic carbon (SOC) both by direct dry combustion using automated analyzers and indirectly – by I.V. Tyurin and Walkley–Black oxidation. Author's and literature experimental data of SOC analyses in various soils by these methods are presented. Comparative analysis of the above data showed that in some cases the content of SOC determined by oxidability is lower than the one obtained by dry combustion (in most cases), while in others, on the contrary, the content of SOC is higher. This conclusion fully complies with the theoretical views of I.V. Tyurin on the chemical nature of soil organic matter (SOM). A schematic description of determining the content of total (organic) carbon in non-carbonate soils by dry combustion method using automated analyzers Leco (USA) and AH-7529 (Gomel, Belarus) is given. It was pointed out that it is difficult to determine SOC content by dry combustion method with automated analyzers in carbonate soils. For these soils it is recommended to determine the content of inorganic carbon by decomposition of carbonates with HClO4 solution using express analyzer AN-7529. The direct method of determining the content of SOC has the best metrological characteristics compared to ones of the indirect method, which convincingly confirms the authoritative opinions of Schollenberg and Tyurin about the inaccuracy of the latter. It is concluded that the indicators determined by the methods of Tyurin and Walkley–Black and dry combustion are chemically independent, characterizing, respectively, the oxidability and organic carbon content of SOM. It is recommended to use dry combustion method with automated analyzers when monitoring the content and stocks of organic carbon in soils.
Keywords
About the Authors
B. M. KogutRussian Federation
E. Yu. Milanovsky
Russian Federation
Sh. A. Hamatnurov
Russian Federation
References
1. Kogut B.M. (Compiler), Analiticheskoe obespechenie monitoringa gumusovogo sostoyaniya pochv (Analytical support for monitoring of humus condition of soils), Moscow: RASKhN, 1993, 74 p.
2. Bol'shakov V.A., Nadezhnost' analiza pochv: problemy i resheniya (Reliability of soil analysis: Problems and Solutions), Moscow: Pochvennyi in-t im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 1992, 144 p.
3. Bol'shakov V.A., Kogut B.M., Frid A.S., Pereattestatsiya gosudarstvennykh standartnykh obraztsov pochvennykh mass (Re-certification of state standard samples of soils), Pochvovedenie, 1995, No. 3, pp. 308–313.
4. Vaksman S.A., Gumus. Proiskhozhdenie, khimicheskii sostav i znachenie ego v prirode (Humus. Origin, chemical composition and its significance in nature.), Moscow: Ogiz-Sel'khozgiz, 1937, 471 p.
5. Ishcherekov V.I., Opredelenie gumusa v pochve titrovaniem khameleonom (Determination of humus in the soil by titration chameleon), Zhurnal opytnoi agronomii, 1904, Vol. .5, pp. 55.
6. Kogut B.M., Frid A.S., Sravnitel'naya otsenka metodov opredeleniya soderzhaniya gumusa v pochvakh (Comparative evaluation of methods of determination of humus content in soils), Pochvovedenie, 1993, No. 9, pp. 119–123.
7. Kogut B.M., Semenov V.M., Artem'eva Z.S., Danchenko N.N., Degumusirovanie i pochvennaya sekvestratsiya ugleroda (Dehumification and soil carbon sequestration), Agrokhimiya, 2021, No. 5, pp. 3–13.
8. Kochetov A.I., Shevchenko A.V., Astapenko E.V., Marchenko T.I., Opredelenie ugleroda v pochvakh na baze ekspress-analizatora AN-7529 (Determination of carbon in the soil based on express analyzer AN-7529), Proc. of the YII delegate congress of VOP, Tashkent, 1985, Part 2, p. 122.
9. Bol'shakov V.A., Frid A.S., Sorokin S.E. (Compilers), Metrologicheskoe obespechenie analiticheskikh rabot v pochvovedenii. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii (Metrological Support of Analytical Works in Soil Science. Methodical recommendations), Moscow: Pochvennyi in-t im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 1988, 112 p.
10. Milanovskiy E.Yu., Gumusovye veshchestva pochv kak prirodnye gidrofobno-gidrofil'nye soedineniya (Humus substances of soils as natural hydrophobic-hydrophilic compounds), Moscow: GEOS, 2009, 188 p.
11. Nikitin B.A., Metod opredeleniya gumusa pochvy (Method of determination of soil humus), Agrokhimiya, 1999, No. 5, p. 91.
12. Orlov D.S., Biryukova O.N., Sukhanova N.I., Organicheskoe veshchestvo pochv Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Organic matter of soils of the Russian Federation), Moscow: Nauka, 1996, 256 p.
13. Ponomareva V.V., Plotnikova T.A., Nekotorye dannye o stepeni vnutrimolekudyarnoi okislennosti gumusa raznykh tipov pochv (k voprosu o perevodnom koeffitsiente s ugleroda na gumus) (Some data on the degree of intramolecular oxidation of humus of different types of soils (to the question of the transfer coefficient from carbon to humus)), Pochvovedenie, 1967, No. 7, pp. 85–95.
14. Bol'shakov V.A., Sorokin S.E., Svishchev L.E. (Compilers), Rentgenofluorestsentnyi energodispersionnyi metod analiza pochv v tselyakh kontrolya kachestva ikh zagryaznennosti: Metod. Rekomendatsii (X-ray fluorescent energy dispersive method of analysis of soils to control the quality of their contamination: Guidelines), Moscow: Pochv. in-t im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 1982, 48 p.
15. Srapenyants S.A., Brodskii E.S., Klyagin K.N., Shevtsova L.K., Ekspressnoe opredelenie ugleroda v pochvakh metodom sozhzheniya (Express determination of carbon in soils by burning method), Agrokhimiya, 1979, No. 7, pp. 132–137.
16. Vorob'eva L.A. (Ed.), Teoriya i praktika khimicheskogo analiza pochv (Theory and practice of chemical analysis of soils), Moscow: GEOS, 2006, 400 p.
17. Titova N.A., Kogut B.M., Transformatsiya organicheskogo veshchestva pri sel'skokhozyaistvennom ispol'zovanii pochv (Transformation of organic matter during agricultural use of soils), In: Itogi nauki i tekhniki (seriya pochvovedenie i agrokhimiya) (Results of science and technology (series of Soil Science and Agrochemistry)), Vol. 8, Moscow: Izd-vo VINITI, 1991, 156 p.
18. Tyurin I.V., Novoe vidoizmenenie ob"emnogo metoda opredeleniya gumusa s pomoshch'yu khromovoi kisloty (New modification of volumetric method of determination of humus with chromic acid), Pochvovedenie, 1931, No. 5–6, pp. 36–47.
19. Tyurin I.V., K voprosu o metodike izucheniya organicheskogo veshchestva pochvy v biokhimicheskom otnoshenii (To a question about methods of study of organic matter of soil in biochemical sense), Tr. Pochv. in-ta im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 1934, Vol. 10(4), pp. 27–37.
20. Tyurin I.V., Materialy po sravnitel'nomu izucheniyu metodov opredeleniya organicheskogo ugleroda v pochvakh. Metody opredeleniya obshchego organicheskogo ugleroda i uglekisloty karbonatov (Materials on the comparative study of methods for determining organic carbon in soils. Methods of determining the total organic carbon and carbonate carbonates), In: Probl. sov. Pochvovedeniya (Problems of modern soil science), 1936, Collection of articles No. 2, p. 121.
21. Tyurin I.V., Organicheskoe veshchestvo pochv i ego rol' v pochvoobrazovanii i plodorodii. Uchenie o pochvennom gumuse (Organic matter of soils and its role in soil formation and fertility. Doctrine of Soil Humus), Moscow–Leningrad: Sel'khozgiz, 1937, 287 p.
22. Chernova O.V., Golozubov O.M., Vsemirnaya karta zapasov organicheskogo ugleroda v 30 sm sloe pochvy dlya territorii Rossii (proekt FAO OON GSOC17) (World map of organic carbon stocks in 30 centimeters soil layer for the territory of Russia (UN FAO GSOC17 project)), In: Sovremennoe sostoyanie chernozemov. Mat-ly II Mezhdunarod. nauchn. konf. (Modern state of black earth, Proc. of II International scientific conference), Rostov on Don–Taganrog, 2018, Vol. 1, pp. 49–56.
23. Shamrikova E.V., Vanchikova E.V., Kondratenok B.M. et al., Problems and limitations of the dichromatometric method for measuring soil organic matter content: A Review, Eurasian Soil Sc., 2022, No. 55, pp. 861–867, DOI: 10.1134/S1064229322070092.
24. Apesteguia M., Plante A.F., Virtoc I., Methods assessment for organic and inorganic carbon quantification in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean region, Geoderma Regional, 2018, Vol. 12, pp. 39–48.
25. Blakemore L.C., Searle P.L., Daly B.K., Methods for chemical analysis of soils, New Zealand Soil Bureau, Scientific Report 10, Dep. of Sci. and Industrial Res. New Zealand, 1977, 112 p.
26. Ciavatta C., Vittori L. Antisari, Sequi P., Determination of organic carbon in soils and fertilizers, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1989, Vol. 20, Iss. 7–8, pp. 759–773.
27. Jankauskas B., Jankauskiene G., Slepetiene A., Booth C., International comparison of analytical methods of determining the soil organic matter content of Lithuanian Eutric Albeluvisols, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2006, Vol. 37, pp. 707–720.
28. Knop W., Ueber die Bedeutung des Humus, Landw.Vers. Sta., 1872, Vol. 15, pp. 13–21.
29. Nelson, D.W., Sommers, L.E., Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter, In: Sparks D.L. et al. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, SSSA Book Series, Madison, 1996, pp. 961–1010.
30. Sato J.H., Figueiredo C.C., Marchão R.L., Madari B.E., Benedito L.E.C., Busato J.G., Souza D.M., Methods of soil organic carbon determination in Brazilian savannah soils, Sci. Agric., 2014, Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 302–308.
31. Yugini Y., Baritz R., Vargas R.R. (Eds.), Soil Organic carbon mapping, GSOC Map. cookbook manual, Rome, 2017.
32. Shamrikova E.V., Kondratenok B.M., Tumanova E.A., Vanchikova E.V., Lapteva E.M., Zonova T.V., Lu-Lyan-Min E.I., Davydova A.P., Libohova Z., Suvannang N., Transferability between soil organic matter measurement methods for database harmonization, Geoderma, 2022, Vol. 412, 115547.
33. Schollenberger С.J., A rapid approximate method for determining soil organic matter, Soil Science, 1927, No. 1, XXIV.
34. Tabatabai M.A., Bremner J.M., Use of the Leco automatic 70-second carbon analyzer for total carbon analyses of soils, Soil Sci.Soc. Amer. Proc., 1970, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 608–610.
35.
Review
For citations:
Kogut B.M., Milanovsky E.Yu., Hamatnurov Sh.A. Methods for determining the organic carbon content in soils (critical review). Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin. 2023;(114):5-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2023-114-5-28