Preview

Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin

Advanced search

Winemaking terroir – the guideline for choosing of grape rootstocks for soils with different characteristics

https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2023-116-155-187

Abstract

The selection of rootstocks is one of the first and most important stages in the establishment of grape plantations under grafted conditions, which determines the productivity of rootstock-scion combinations and the further chain of design solutions: spatial placement of rows on the land plot, accompanying the production process of agronomic and agrochemical methods. Given the high importance of terroir factors for viticulture and winemaking, we were aware of the need to consider them in detail at this design stage. The aim was to create an algorithm for selecting varieties based on local terroir factors and apply it to the design of vineyards. Based on the analysis of literary sources and the agronomic experience of viticulture and winemaking specialists, we have identified key stress factors that in general, should be taken into account when selecting varieties of rootstocks. Based on the results of a comprehensive study of terroir and analytical diagnostics of soil samples taken on a land plot located in the Bakhchisaray district of the Republic of Crimea, local stress factors representing risks were clarified and prioritized neo-medially at the site of testing the landscape-adapted approach to the selection of rootstocks: carbonate condition, risk of phylloxera infestation, high content of fine fractions in granulometric composition, short-term droughts, risk of local overwatering, phosphorus deficiency. In total 20 the most common commercial varieties of rootstocks were considered for each selected soil area. The sample reduction scenario, based on the prioritization of the above stressors, reduced the number of varieties considered to three variants: 1103 Paulsen, 140 Ruggeri, and Fercal, which were scored against each other and considering the local terroir conditions of the plot, for further comparison in terms of market and logistics in making the final design decision.

About the Authors

А. А. Averianov
Saint-Petersburg State University; Terroir Concept SPBU LLC
Russian Federation

Department of Soil Science and Ecology, Institute of Earth Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, third-year postgraduate student

Terroir Concept SPBU LLC, CEO



E. D. Androsova
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Department of Soil Science and Ecology, Institute of Earth Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, student (bachelor's degree)



A. V. Rusakov
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Geography, Head of the Department of Soil Science and Ecology of Soils, Institute of Earth Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, Professor



References

1. Aver'yanov A.A., Ovchinnikov V.P., Tyazhelye metally v pochvakh vinogradnikov departamenta Atlanticheskaya Luara (Frantsuzskaya Respu-blika) i avtonomnogo territorial'nogo obrazovaniya Gagauziya (Respublika Moldova). (Heavy metals in the soils of vineyarda1. Aver'yanov A.A., Ovchinnikov V.P., Tyazhelye metally v pochvakh vinogradnikov departamenta Atlanticheskaya Luara (Frantsuzskaya Respublika) i avtonomnogo territorial'nogo obrazovaniya Gagauziya (Respublika Moldova). (Heavy metals in the soils of vineyards in the Atlantic Loire Department (French Republic) and the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia (Republic of Moldova)), In: Geografiya: razvitie nauki i obrazovaniya. LXXI Gertsenovskie Chteniya. (Geography: development of science and education. LXXI Herzen Readings.), Saint-Petersburg: A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 2018, pp. 14–19.

2. Aleinikova N.V., Borisenko M.N., Galkina E.S., Radionovskaya Ya.E., Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya vrednykh organizmov v ampelotsenozakh Kryma (Current trends in the development of pests in the Crimean ampelocenoses), Plodovodstvo i vinogra-darstvo Yuga Rossii, 2016, No. 42(06), pp. 119–133.

3. Atlas: Avtonomnaya Respublika Krym (Atlas: Autonomous Republic of Crimea), Kiev-Simferopol', 2003, 80 p.

4. Vorob'eva L.A., Khimicheskii analiz pochv (Soil chemical analysis), Moskow: Izd-vo MGU, 1998, 272 p.

5. Gagerova A.V., Garmashova E.P., Obzor rynka vinogradarstva i vinodeliya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na fone obshchemirovykh tendentsii (Overview of viticulture and winemaking market of the Russian Federation against the background of global trends), Ekonomika. Informatika, 2020, Vol. 47(3), pp. 501–511, DOI: 10.18413/2687‐0932‐2020‐47‐3‐501‐511.

6. GOST 12536-2014 (Interstate Standard), Moscow: izd-vo Standartinform, 2015.

7. Dragan N.A., Pochvennye resursy Kryma (Soil resources of the Crimea), Simferopol': DOLYa, 2004, 208 p.

8. Itogi pervogo Rossiiskogo vinodel'cheskogo foruma (The results of the first Russian Wine Forum), Novosti Fonda Roskongress, URL: https://roscongress.org/news/podvedeny-itogi-pervogo-rossijskogo-vinodelcheskogo-foruma/.

9. Kabata-Pendias A., Pendias X., Mikroelementy v pochvakh i rasteniyakh (Trace elements in soils and plants), Mocsow: Mir, 1989, 439 p.

10. Klassifikaciya i diagnostika pochv Rossii (Classification and diagnostics of soils in Russia), Smolensk: Ojkumena, 2004, 342 p.

11. Logvinova K.T, Barabash M.B., Klimat i opasnye gidrometeorologicheskie yavleniya Kryma (Climate and dangerous hydrometeorological phenomena in the Crimea), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1982, 318 p.

12. Konup L.A, Vlasov V.V., Bakterial'nyi rak vinograda i bor'ba s nim (na primere Yuga Ukrainy) (Bacterial cancer of grapes and its control (by the example of the South of Ukraine)), Nauka Yuga Rossii. Vestnik Yuzhnogo Nauchnogo Tsentra, 2016, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 44–50.

13. Kreier K.G., Bankina T.A., Orlova N.E., Yur'eva G.M., Praktikum po agrokhimicheskomu analizu pochv (Practical Guide to Agrochemical Soil Analysis), Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2005, 88 p.

14. Perova L.I., Luk'yanov A.A., Denisova T.A., Izvestkovyi khloroz vinograda, ego predupre-zhdenie i lechenie (Lime chlorosis of grapes, its prevention and treatment), In: Innovatsionnye tekhnologii i tendentsii v razvitii i formirovanii sovremennogo vinogradarstva i vinodeliya, Anapskaya zonal'naya opytnaya stantsiya vinogradarstva i vinodeliya, Anapa, 2013, pp. 170–176.

15. Zhukov A.I., Perov N.N., Il'yashenko O.M., Privitaya kul'tura vinograda (A grafted grape crop), Mocsow: Rosagropromizdat, 1989, 160 p.

16. Rastvorova O.G., Andreev D.P., Gagarina E.I., Kasatkina G.A., Fedorova N.N., Khimicheskii analiz pochv (Soil chemical analysis), Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 1995, 264 p.

17. Pozachenyuk E.A., Sovremennye landshafty Kryma i sopredel'nykh akvatorii (Modern Landscapes of the Crimea and Adjacent Waters), Simferopol': Biznes-Inform, 2009, 611 p.

18. Unguryan V.G., Pochva i vinograd (Soil and grapes), Kishinev: Kartya Moldovenyaske, 1979, 211 p.

19. Stoeva K.D., Fiziologiya vinograda i osnovy ego vozdelyvaniya (Physiology of grapes and basics of their cultivation, Vol. 1, Sofiya: izdatel'stvo Bolgarskoi Akademii nauk, 1981, 332 p.

20. Shein E.V., Kurs fiziki pochv (Soil Physics Course), Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 2005, 432 p.

21. Burr T.J., Katz B.H., Isolation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3 from grapevine galls and sap, and from vineyard soil, Phytopathology, 1983, Vol. 73, pp. 163–165.

22. Burr T.J., Katz B.H., Bishop A.L., Population of Agrobacterium in vineyard and nonvineyard soils and grape roots in vineyards and nurseries, Plant Dis., 1987, Vol. 71, pp. 617–620.

23. Christiansen L.P., Wolpert J.A., Bettiga, Dokoozlian N., Walker M.A., Wine Grape Varieties in California, California: UC Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2003, 188 p.

24. Drouineau G., Dosage rapide du calcaire actif des sols, Ann. Agron., 1942, pp. 441–450.

25. Guide des Vignobles Rhône Méditerranée, URL: https://fliphtml5.com/bdgl/yjfp/basic.

26. Lehoczky J., Root system of the grapevine as a reservoir of Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Plant Pathol. Bacteriol. Angers, 1978, pp. 239–243.

27. Manulis S., Chalupowiez L., Dror O., Kleitman F., Molecular diagnostic procedures for production of pathogen – free propagation material, Pest Manag. Science, 2002, Vol. 58, pp. 1126–1131.

28. Morton L.T., Rootstock review, how to set priorities when choosing rootstocks, In: Wines and Vines, 2007.

29. Ophel K., Kerr A., Agrobacterium vitis, new species for strains of Agrobacterium biovar 3 from grapevines, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 1990, Vol. 40, pp. 236–241.

30. Plantgrape, Catalogue of grapevines cultivated in France, 2007, URL: https://plantgrape.plantnet-project.org/en/.

31. Pu X.A., Goodman R.N., Tumor formation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens is suppressed by Agrobacterium radiobacter HLB-2 on grape plants, Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 1993, Vol. 44, pp. 249–254.

32. Rahemi A., Dodson Peterson J.C., Lund K.T., Choosing Grape Rootstock, Grape Rootstocks and Related Species, Springer, 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99407-5_9.

33. Resolution OIV. Viti 333. Definition of vitivinicultural “Terroir”, The General Director of the International Organisation of Vine and Wine, General assembly Tbilisi (Georgia), 2010, p. 1.

34. Reynolds A.G., Wardle D.A., Rootstocks impact vine performance and fruit composition of grapes in British Columbia, Hort. Technology, 1993, Vol. 11, pp. 419–427.

35. Seguin G., Terroirs and pedology of vine growing, Experientia, 1986, Vol. 42, pp. 861–873.

36. Wine Australia, Grapevine rootstock selector tool, URL: http://www.grapevinerootstock.com/.

37. s in the Atlantic Loire De-partment (French Republic) and the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia (Republic of Moldova)), v kn.: Geografiya: razvitie nauki i obrazovaniya. LXXI Gertsenovskie Chteniya. (Geography: development of science and edu-cation. LXXI Herzen Readings.), Saint-Petersburg, April 18-21, 2018. St. Pe-tersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia. A. I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University: pp. 14–19, 2018.

38. Aleinikova N.V., Borisenko M.N., Galkina E.S., Radionovskaya Ya.E., Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya vrednykh organizmov v ampelotsenozakh Kryma (Current trends in the development of pests in the Crimean ampeloce-noses), Plodovodstvo i vinogra-darstvo Yuga Rossii, Krasnodar, SKZ-NIISiV, 2016, No 42(06), pp. 119–133.

39. Atlas: Avtonomnaya Respublika Krym (Atlas: Autonomous Republic of Crimea), Kiev-Simferopol', 2003, 80 p.

40. Vorob'eva L.A., Khimicheskii analiz pochv (Soil chemical analysis), Moskow, Izd-vo MGU, 1998, 272 p., ISBN 5-211-03973.

41. Gagerova A.V., Garmashova E.P., Obzor rynka vinogradarstva i vinodeliya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na fone obshchemirovykh tendentsii (Over-view of viticulture and winemaking market of the Russian Federation against the background of global trends), Ekonomika. Informatika, 47 (3), pp. 501–511, 2020, DOI: 10.18413/2687‐0932‐2020‐47‐3‐501‐511.

42. GOST 12536-2014 (Interstate Standard), Moscow: izd-vo Standartin-form, 2015.

43. Dragan N.A., Pochvennye resursy Kryma (Soil resources of the Cri-mea), Simferopol':DOLYa, 2004, 208 p.

44. Itogi pervogo Rossiiskogo vinodel'cheskogo foruma (The results of the first Russian Wine Forum), Novosti Fonda Roskongress, URL: https://roscongress.org/news/podvedeny-itogi-pervogo-rossijskogo-vinodelcheskogo-foruma/.

45. Kabata-Pendias A., Pendias X., Mikroelementy v pochvakh i ras-teniyakh (Trace elements in soils and plants), Mocsow: Mir, 1989, 439 p.

46. Klassifikaciya i diagnostika pochv Rossii (Classification and diagnos-tics of soils in Russia), Smolensk: Ojkumena, 2004, 342 p.

47. Logvinova K.T, Barabash M.B., Klimat i opasnye gidrometeoro-logicheskie yavleniya Kryma (Climate and dangerous hydrometeorological phenomena in the Crimea), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1982, 318 p.

48. Konup L. A, Vlasov V. V., Bakterial'nyi rak vinograda i bor'ba s nim (na primere Yuga Ukrainy) (Bacterial cancer of grapes and its control (by the example of the South of Ukraine)), Nauka Yuga Rossii. Vestnik Yuzhnogo Nauchnogo Tsentra, 2016, Vol. 12 No 3, pp. 44–50.

49. Kreier K. G., Bankina T. A., Orlova N. E., Yur'eva G. M., Praktikum po agrokhimicheskomu analizu pochv (Practical Guide to Agrochemical Soil Analysis), Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2005, 88 p.

50. Perova L. I., Luk'yanov A. A., Denisova T. A., Izvestkovyi khloroz vinograda, ego predupre-zhdenie i lechenie (Lime chlorosis of grapes, its pre-vention and treatment), Innovatsionnye tekhnologii i tendentsii v razvitii i formirovanii sovremennogo vinogradarstva i vinodeliya, Anapskaya zon-al'naya opytnaya stantsiya vinogradarstva i vinodeliya, Anapa, 2013, pp. 170–176.

51. Zhukov A. I., Perov N. N., Il'yashenko O. M., Privitaya kul'tura vinograda (A grafted grape crop), Mocsow: Rosagropromizdat, 1989, 160 p. ISBN 5-260-00155-9.

52. Rastvorova O. G., Andreev D. P., Gagarina E. I., Kasatkina G. A., Fe-dorova N. N., Khimicheskii analiz pochv (Soil chemical analysis), Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 1995, 264 p.

53. E.A. Pozachenyuk, Sovremennye landshafty Kryma i sopredel'nykh akvatorii (Modern Landscapes of the Crimea and Adjacent Waters), Simfe-ropol': Biznes-Inform, 2009, 611 p.

54. Unguryan V. G., Pochva i vinograd (Soil and grapes), Kishinev: Kartya Moldovenyaske, 1979, 211 p.

55. Stoeva K.D., Fiziologiya vinograda i osnovy ego vozdelyvaniya (Phys-iology of grapes and basics of their cultivation, Vol 1. Sofiya: izdatel'stvo Bolgarskoi Akademii nauk, 1981, 332 p.

56. Shein E.V., Kurs fiziki pochv (Soil Physics Course), Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 2005, 432 p. ISBN 5-211-05021-5.

57. Alireza Rahemi , Jean C. Dodson Peterson , Karl True Lund., Grape Rootstocks and Related Species, 212 p. 2022.

58. Burr T.J., Katz B.H.. Isolation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3 from grapevine galls and sap, and from vineyard soil. Phytopathology. 73, 1983, pp. 163–165.

59. Burr T.J., Katz B.H., Bishop A.L.. Population of Agrobacterium in vineyard and nonvineyard soils and grape roots in vineyards and nurseries. Plant Dis. 71, 1987, pp. 617–620.

60. Drouineau G., Dosage rapide du calcaire actif des sols. Ann. Agron., 1942, pp. 441–450.

61. Guide des Vignobles Rhône Méditerranée, URL: https://fliphtml5.com/bdgl/yjfp/basic.

62. Lehoczky J.. Root system of the grapevine as a reservoir of Agrobacte-rium tumefaciens cells. In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Plant Pathol. Bacteriol. (An-gers, France, 1978), 1978, pp. 239–243.

63. Manulis S., Chalupowiez L., Dror O., Kleitman F.. Molecular diagnostic procedures for production of pathogen — free propagation material. Pest Manag. Science. 58, 2002, pp. 1126–1131.

64. Morton LT. Rootstock review, how to set priorities when choosing root-stocks. Wines and Vines, 2007.

65. Ophel K., Kerr A.. Agrobacterium vitis, new species for strains of Agro-bacterium biovar 3 from grapevines. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 40, 1990, pp. 236–241.

66. Peter Christensen, Nick Dokoozlian, Andrew Walker, James Wolpert. Wine Grape Varieties in California, UC Agriculture and Natural Resources; 1st edition (June 1, 2003) 188 p.

67. Plantgrape. Catalogue of grapevines cultivated in France, 2007, URL: https://plantgrape.plantnet-project.org/en/.

68. Pu X.A., Goodman R.N.. Tumor formation by Agrobacterium tumefa-ciens is suppressed by Agrobacterium radiobacter HLB-2 on grape plants. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 44, 1993, pp. 249–254.

69. Resolution OIV, Viti 333, 2010, Definition of vitivinicultural “Ter-roir”. The General Director of the International Organisation of Vine and Wine. General assembly Tbilisi (Georgia), 2010. P. 1.

70. Reynolds A.G., Wardle D.A., Rootstocks impact vine performance and fruit composition of grapes in British Columbia. Hort Technology, 11, 2001, pp. 419–427.

71. Seguin G. Terroirs and pedology of vine growing, Experientia, 1986. Vol. 42, pp. 861–873.

72. Wine Australia. Grapevine rootstock selector tool, URL: http://www.grapevinerootstock.com/.

73.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Averianov А.А., Androsova E.D., Rusakov A.V. Winemaking terroir – the guideline for choosing of grape rootstocks for soils with different characteristics. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin. 2023;(116):155-187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2023-116-155-187

Views: 683


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0136-1694 (Print)
ISSN 2312-4202 (Online)