Representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soil
https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2025-122-5-20
Abstract
The aim to solve the methodological problem of assessing variability of soil organic carbon content (Corg) in layer 0–20 cm based on 10-fold independent mixed sampling from the same field during one day. The soil sampling was carried out on 4 fields ranging from 6 to 16 hectares (Tver region). The soil cover pattern is represented by patches of agrosod-podzolic gleyic sandy loam and loam soils (Albic Retisols (Aric, Loamic)) developed from binary deposits and agrosod-podzols (Albic Podzols (Aric, Arenic)) developed from sands underlying loamy moraine from the depth 80–150 cm. It has been established that the variation in Corg content in mixed samples reflects the spatial component that is sometimes comparable to, but more often significantly higher than analytical reproducibility of laboratory methods for determination Corg (Turin method and dry combustion method). To compare single measurements of Corg in mixed samples obtained at different time periods or from different fields, the use of even the full confidence range based on the interlaboratory reproducibility of the determination method turns out to be an unreasonably low estimate. To conduct monitoring of Corg content, it is necessary to assess the spatial variation of the indicator, even when selecting mixed samples.
About the Author
N. B. Khitrov
Federal Research Centre “V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
7 Bld. 2 Pyzhevskiy per., Moscow 119017
References
1. Analiticheskoe obespechenie monitoringa gumusovogo sostojanija pochv: Metodicheskie rekomendacii (Analytical support for monitoring the humus status of soils: Methodological recommendations), Moscow: Rosselkhozakademia, Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, 1993, 73 p.
2. Vnutrilaboratornyj kontrol' vosproizvodimosti rezul'tatov analiza pochvenno-agrohimicheskih ob’ektov. Metodicheskie rekomendacii (In-laboratory control of the reproducibility of the results of the analysis of soil and agrochemical objects, Guidelines), Moscow: Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, 1984, 23 p.
3. GOST 26213-2021. Soils. Methods for determining organic matter.
4. Dospekhov B.A., Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoj obrabotki rezul'tatov issledovanij) (Methodology of field experience (with the basics of statistical processing of research results)), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985, 351 p.
5. Metodika otbora pochvennyh prob po jelementarnym uchastkam polja v celjah differencirovannogo primenenija udobrenij (Methodology for collecting soil samples in elementary areas of the field for the purpose of differentiated application of fertilizers) / Compiled by: V.G. Sychev, R.A. Afanasyev, G.I. Leachman, M.N. Marchenko, Moscow: VNIIA, 2007, 36 p.
6. Metodicheskie ukazanija po provedeniju kompleksnogo monitoringa plodorodija pochv zemel' sel'skohozjajstvennogo naznachenija (Guidelines for conducting comprehensive monitoring of soil fertility on agricultural lands) / Ed. L.M. Derzhavina, D.S. Bulgakov, Moscow: FGNU “Rosinformagrotekh”, 2003, 240 p.
7. (Guidelines for conducting local monitoring at reference and control sites) / Compiled by: V.G. Sychev, A.V. Kuznetsov, A.V. Pavlikhina, L.K. Kruchinina, N.V. Vasilyeva, N.V. Lobas. Moscow: FGNU “Rosinformagrotekh”, 2006, 76 p.
8. Khitrov N.B., Nikitin D.A., Ivanova E.A., Semenov M.V., Variability of the content and stock of soil organic matter in time and space: an analytical review, Eurasian Soil Science, 2023, Vol. 56, No. 12, pp. 1819–1844, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422932360207X.
Review
For citations:
Khitrov N.B. Representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soil. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin. 2025;(122):5-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2025-122-5-20
Views:
347
Email this article 
