Analysis of hydrophysical properties of soils using pore-network models
https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2025-123-30-64
Abstract
Modern soil physical models traditionally consider the pore space as static; however, new visualization techniques, such as X-ray tomography, have revealed structural dynamics that can intensively change under the influence of moisture and temperature. The aim of this study is to investigate the structure of the pore space using pore network models (PNMs) and to compare them with the method of the water retention curve (WRC). The study was based on the laboratory experiment involving the wetting and drying of samples of Haplic Chernozem from the Kursk region, with measurements of WRC and registration of the soil structure state using X-ray computed tomography (XCT). From the 3D soil images, PNMs were extracted, for which hydrophysical properties were calculated, including modeling of the WRC and the water conductivity. The comparison of pore sizes and volumes shows a significant excess of the pore volume calculated based on WRC measurements, compared to direct geometry measurements by XCT. The difference in the representation of the pore space is expressed through significant differences in modeling of water conductivity based on PNMs in the regions of low and high capillar pressure (large and small pore sizes, respectively) compared to the approach based on WRC modeling using the van Genuchten and van Genuchten-Mualem equations. However, the curves of relative unsaturated hydraulic conductivity measured using PNMs and based on WRC show a high degree of similarity. Based on the results of the study, it was demonstrated that modeling soil hydrophysical properties using PNMs is a highly promising approach and has the potential to be a more reliable tool for modeling water dynamics than the approach based on describing WRC using the van Genuchten equation. Nevertheless, the fundamental differences between the methods leave several questions open that require answers before the widespread use of PNMs for calculation of soil hydrophysical properties.
About the Authors
K. D. TolstyginRussian Federation
7 Bld. 2 Pyzhevskiy per., Moscow 119017;
1 Leninskie Gori, Moscow 119234
D. S. Fomin
Russian Federation
7 Bld. 2 Pyzhevskiy per., Moscow 119017
A. V. Yudina
Russian Federation
7 Bld. 2 Pyzhevskiy per., Moscow 119017
K. M. Gerke
Russian Federation
1 Bld. 10 B. Gruzinskaya Str., Moscow 123242
References
1. Abrosimov K.N., Gerke K.M., Fomin D.S., Romanenko K.A., Korost D.V., Tomografiya v pochvovedenii: ot pervykh opytov k sovremennym metodam (obzor) (Tomography in Soil Science: from the first experiments to modern methods (review)), Pochvovedenie, 2021, Vol. 55, No. 9, pp. 1097–1112.
2. Vadyunina A.F., Korchagina Z.A., Metody opredeleniya fiziche-skikh svoistv pochv i gruntov (Methods for determining the physical properties of soils and grounds), Moscow: Vyshaya shkola, 1961, 345 p.
3. Gerke K.M., Skvortsova E.B., Korost D.V., Tomograficheskii me-tod issledovaniya porovogo prostranstva pochv: sostoyanie pro-blemy i izuchenie nekotorykh pochv Rossii (Tomographic method for studying the pore space of soils: the state of the problem and the study of some soils of Russia), Pochvovedenie, 2012, No. 7, pp 781–781.
4. Dedyulina E.A., Vasilevskii P.Yu., Pozdnyakov S.P., Chuvstvi-tel'nost' raschetov infil'tratsionnogo pitaniya k parametru svyaznosti por zony aeratsii (Sensitivity of infiltration recharge calculations to the pore connectivity parameter of the aeration zone), Vestnik Moskovskogo universite-ta. Seriya 4. Geologiya, 2020, No. 1, pp. 81–87.
5. Ivanov A.L., Shein E.V., Skvortsova E.B., Tomografiya porovogo prostranstva pochv: ot morfologicheskoi kharakteristiki k strukturno-funktsional'nym otsenkam (Tomography of soil pore space: from morphological characteristics to structural and functional assessments), Pochvovedenie, 2019, No. 1, pp. 61–69.
6. Romanenko K.A., Abrosimov K.N., Kurchatova A.N., Rogov V.V., Opyt primeneniya rentgenovskoi komp'yuternoi tomografii v issledovanii mikrostroeniya merzlykh porod i pochv (Experience in using X-ray computed tomography in studying the microstructure of frozen rocks and soils), Kriosfera Zemli, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 75–81.
7. Shein E.V., Kurs fiziki pochv (Soil Physics Course), Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 2005, 432 p.
8. Skvortsova E.B., Stroenie porovogo prostranstva estestvennykh i antropogennoizmenennykh pochv: Diss. … dokt. s.-kh. nauk (Structure of pore space of natural and anthropogenically modified soils, Dr. agric. sci. thesis), Moscow, 03.00.27, 1999, 397 p.
9. Yudina A.V., Fomin D.S., Energy of dispersing of loamy soils to elementary particles using ultrasound, Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin, 2023, Vol. 115, pp. 87–106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2023-115-87-106.
10. Ahrenholz B., Tölke J., Lehmann P., Peters A., Kaestner A., Krafczyk M., Durner W., Prediction of capillary hysteresis in a porous material using lattice-Boltzmann methods and comparison to experimental data and a morphological pore network model, Advances in Water Resources, 2008, Vol. 31, No. 9, pp. 1151–1173.
11. Bai H., Zhou X., Zhao Y., Zhao Y., Han Q., Soil CT image quality enhancement via an improved super-resolution reconstruction method based on GAN, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2023, Vol. 213, Art. No. 108177.
12. Ball B.C., Soil structure and greenhouse gas emissions: a synthesis of 20 years of experimentation, European Journal of Soil Science, 2013, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 357–373.
13. Barbosa L.A.P., Gerke K.M. Gerke H.H., Modelling of soil mechanical stability and hydraulic permeability of the interface between coated biopore and matrix pore regions, Geoderma, 2022, Vol. 410, Art. No. 115673.
14. Bentz J., Patel R.A., Benard P., Lieu A., Haupenthal A., Kroener E., How heterogeneous pore scale distributions of wettability affect infiltration into porous media, Water, 2022, Vol. 14(7), Art. No. 1110.
15. Bernabé Y., Li M., Maineult A., Permeability and pore connectivity: a new model based on network simulations, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2010, Vol. 115, No. B10.
16. Blunt M.J., Flow in porous media–pore-network models and multiphase flow, Current opinion in colloid & interface science, 2001, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 197–207.
17. Bronick C.J., Lal R., Soil structure and management: a review, Geoderma, 2005, Vol. 124, No. 1–2, pp. 3–22.
18. Buades A., Coll B., Morel J.M., Non-local means denoising, Image Processing On Line, 2011, Vol. 1, pp. 208–212.
19. Dullien F.A.L., Porous media: fluid transport and pore structure, Academic press, 2012, 598 p.
20. Fagbemi S., Tahmasebi P., Coupling pore network and finite element methods for rapid modelling of deformation, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, Vol. 897, No. A20.
21. Fan I., The Network Model of Porous Media I. Capillary Pressure Characteristics, Petroleum Transactions, AIME, 1956, Vol. 207, pp. 144–159.
22. Fomin D.S., Yudina A.V., Romanenko K.A., Abrosimov K.N., Karsanina M.V., Gerke K.M., Soil pore structure dynamics under steady-state wetting-drying cycle, Geoderma, 2023, Vol. 432, Art. No. 116401.
23. Fomin D., Timofeeva M., Ovchinnikova O., Valdes-Korovkin I., Holub A., Yudina A., Energy-based indicators of soil structure by automatic dry sieving, Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, Vol. 214, Art. No. 105183.
24. Gerke K.M., Karsanina M.V., Sizonenko T.O., Miao X., Gafurova D.R., Korost D.V., Multi-scale image fusion of X-ray microtomography and SEM data to model flow and transport properties for complex rocks on pore-level, SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, SPE, 2017, D023S014R002.
25. Gerke K.M., Gerke K.M., Khirevich S., Vasilyev R.V, Karsanina M.V., Umarova A.B. Barbosa L.A.P., Korost D.V., Tolstygin K.D., Mallants D., Gerke H.H., Soil hydraulic properties derived from pore-scale simulations: digital assessment of Ksat through model intercomparison and verification with experimental data, Soil and Tillage Research, 2025.
26. Gerke K.M., Sizonenko T.O., Karsanina M.V., Lavrukhin E.V., Abashkin V.V., Korost D.V., Improving watershed-based pore-network extraction method using maximum inscribed ball pore-body positioning, Advances in Water Resources, 2020, Vol. 140, Art. No. 103576.
27. Ghanbarian-Alavijeh B., Liaghat A., Huang G.H., Van Genuchten M.T., Estimation of the van Genuchten soil water retention properties from soil textural data, Pedosphere, 2010, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 456–465.
28. Gharedaghloo B., Price J.S., Rezanezhad F., Quinton W.L., Evaluating the hydraulic and transport properties of peat soil using pore network modeling and X-ray micro computed tomography, Journal of Hydrology, 2018, Vol. 561, pp. 494–508.
29. Gui-Yuan L.I., Hao-Ming F.A.N., Effect of freeze-thaw on water stability of aggregates in a black soil of Northeast China, Pedosphere, 2014, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 285–290.
30. Hashemi M.A., Khaddour G., François B., Massart T.J., Salager S., A tomographic imagery segmentation methodology for three-phase geomaterials based on simultaneous region growing, Acta Geotechnica, 2014, Vol. 9, pp. 831–846.
31. Hunt A.G., Ewing R.P., Horton R., What's wrong with soil physics? Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2013, Vol. 77(6), pp. 1877–1887.
32. Jennings J.B., Capillary pressure techniques: application to exploration and development geology, AAPG Bulletin, 1987, Vol. 71, No. 10, pp. 1196–1209.
33. Karsanina M.V., Gerke K.M., Skvortsova E.B., Ivanov A.L., Mallants D., Enhancing image resolution of soils by stochastic multiscale image fusion, Geoderma, 2018, Vol. 314, pp. 138–145.
34. Karsanina M.V., Gerke K.M., Skvortsova E.B., Mallants D., Universal spatial correlation functions for describing and reconstructing soil microstructure, PloS one, 2015, Vol. 10, No. 5, e0126515.
35. Kay B.D., Soil structure and organic carbon: a review, Soil processes and the carbon cycle, 2018, pp. 169–197.
36. Köhne J.M., Schlüter S., Vogel H.J., Predicting solute transport in structured soil using pore network models, Vadose Zone Journal, 2011, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 1082–1096.
37. Khirevich S., Höltzel A., Hlushkou D., Tallarek U., Impact of conduit geometry and bed porosity on flow and dispersion in noncylindrical sphere packings, Analytical chemistry, 2007, Vol. 79, No. 24, pp. 9340–9349.
38. Lenormand R., Zarcone C., Sarr A., Mechanisms of the displacement of one fluid by another in a network of capillary ducts, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1983, Vol. 135, pp. 337–353.
39. Li X., Teng Q., Zhang Y., Xiong S., Feng J., Three-dimensional multiscale fusion for porous media on microtomography images of different resolutions, Physical Review E, 2020, Vol. 101(5), Art. No. 053308.
40. Ma S., Mason G. Morrow N.R., Effect of contact angle on drainage and imbibition in regular polygonal tubes, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1996, Vol. 117(3), pp. 273–291.
41. Mahabadi N., Dai S., Seol Y., Sup Yun T., Jang J., The water retention curve and relative permeability for gas production from hydrate-bearing sediments: pore-network model simulation, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2016, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 3099–3110.
42. Miranda-Velez J.F., Leuther F., Koehne J.M., Munkholm L.J., Vogeler I., Effects of freeze-thaw cycles on soil structure under different tillage and plant cover management practices, Soil and Tillage Research, 2023, Vol. 225, Art. No. 105540.
43. Mualem Y., A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media, Water resources research, 1976, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 513–522.
44. Øren P.E., Bakke S., Arntzen O.J., Extending predictive capabilities to network models, SPE journal, 1998, Vol. 3(04), pp. 324–336.
45. Patzek T.W., Silin D.B., Shape factor and hydraulic conductance in noncircular capillaries: I. One-phase creeping flow, Journal of colloid and interface science, 2001, Vol. 236, No. 2, pp. 295–304.
46. Patzek T.W., Kristensen J.G., Shape factor correlations of hydraulic conductance in noncircular capillaries: II. Two-phase creeping flow, Journal of colloid and interface science, 2001, Vol. 236, No. 2, pp. 305–317.
47. Rabot E., Wiesmeier M., Schlüter S., Vogel H.J., Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review, Geoderma, 2018, Vol. 314, pp. 122–137.
48. Radcliffe D.E., Simunek J., Soil physics with HYDRUS: Modeling and applications, CRC press, 2018., 348 p.
49. Ranaivomanana H., Das G., Razakamanantsoa A., Modeling of hysteretic behavior of soil–water retention curves using an original pore network model, Transport in Porous Media, 2022, Vol. 142, No. 3, pp. 559–584.
50. Schlüter S., Leuther F., Vogler S., Vogel H.J., X-ray microtomography analysis of soil structure deformation caused by centrifugation, Solid Earth, 2016, Vol. 7(1), pp. 129–140.
51. Tolstygin K.D., Kulygin D.A., Khlyupin A., Romanenko K.A., Gerke K.M., Soil structural transformation under multiple freeze-thaw cycles: comprehensive morphological and topological description, Soil and Tillage research, 2025.
52. Valvatne P.H., Blunt M.J., Predictive pore-scale modeling of two-phase flow in mixed wet media, Water resources research, 2004, Vol. 40(7), W07406.
53. Van Genuchten M.T., A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil science society of America journal, 1980, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 892–898.
54. Vogel H.J., A numerical experiment on pore size, pore connectivity, water retention, permeability, and solute transport using network models, European Journal of Soil Science, 2000, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 99–105.
55. Vogel H.J., Roth K., Quantitative morphology and network representation of soil pore structure, Advances in water resources, 2001, Vol. 24, No. 3–4, pp. 233–242.
56. Vogel H.J., Balseiro-Romero M., Kravchenko A., Otten W., Pot V., Schlüter S., Baveye P.C., A holistic perspective on soil architecture is needed as a key to soil functions, European Journal of Soil Science, 2022, Vol. 73, No. 1, e13152.
57. Wu Y., Tahmasebi P., Lin C., Ren L., Dong C., Multiscale modeling of shale samples based on low-and high-resolution images, Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, Vol. 109, pp. 9–21.
58. Xu R., Prodanović M., Effect of pore geometry on nitrogen sorption isotherms interpretation: A pore network modeling study, Fuel, 2018, Vol. 225, pp. 243–255.
59. Yang Y., Wang K., Zhang L., Sun H., Zhang K., Ma J., Pore-scale simulation of shale oil flow based on pore network model, Fuel, 2019, Vol. 251, pp. 683–692.
60. Yudina A.V. et al., From the notion of elementary soil particle to the particle-size and microaggregate-size distribution analyses: A review, Eurasian soil science, 2018, Vol. 51, pp. 1326–1347.
61. Zubov A.S., Murygin D.A., Gerke K.M., Pore-network extraction using discrete Morse theory: Preserving the topology of the pore space, Physical Review E, 2022, Vol. 106, No. 5, 055304.
Review
For citations:
Tolstygin K.D., Fomin D.S., Yudina A.V., Gerke K.M. Analysis of hydrophysical properties of soils using pore-network models. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin. 2025;(123):30-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2025-123-30-64